Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 22
Filter
3.
Med J Aust ; 215(11): 513-517, 2021 12 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1468685

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the short term ability of Australian intensive care units (ICUs) to increase capacity in response to heightened demand caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN: Survey of ICU directors or delegated senior clinicians (disseminated 30 August 2021), supplemented by Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) registry data. SETTING: All 194 public and private Australian ICUs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of currently available and potentially available ICU beds in case of a surge; available levels of ICU-relevant equipment and staff. RESULTS: All 194 ICUs responded to the survey. The total number of currently open staffed ICU beds was 2183. This was 195 fewer (8.2%) than in 2020; the decline was greater for rural/regional (18%) and private ICUs (18%). The reported maximal ICU bed capacity (5623) included 813 additional physical ICU bed spaces and 2627 in surge areas outside ICUs. The number of available ventilators (7196) exceeded the maximum number of ICU beds. The reported number of available additional nursing staff would facilitate the immediate opening of 383 additional physical ICU beds (47%), but not the additional bed spaces outside ICUs. CONCLUSIONS: The number of currently available staffed ICU beds is lower than in 2020. Equipment shortfalls have been remediated, with sufficient ventilators to equip every ICU bed. ICU capacity can be increased in response to demand, but is constrained by the availability of appropriately trained staff. Fewer than half the potentially additional physical ICU beds could be opened with currently available staff numbers while maintaining pre-pandemic models of care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Hospital Bed Capacity , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , New Zealand/epidemiology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Registries/statistics & numerical data
5.
Healthc Q ; 24(1): 36-43, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1190654

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the many challenges that provincial health systems have experienced while scaling health services to protect Canadians from viral transmission and support care for those who get infected. Supply chain capacity makes it possible for health systems to deliver care and implement public health initiatives safely. In this paper, we present emerging findings from a national research study that documents the key features of the fragility of the health supply chain evident across the seven Canadian provinces. Results suggest that the fragility of the health supply chain contributes to substantive challenges across health systems, thus limiting or precluding proactive and comprehensive responses to pandemic management. These findings inform strategies to strengthen supply chain capacity and performance in order to enable health systems to effectively respond to pandemic events.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , COVID-19/therapy , Canada , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Humans , Materials Management, Hospital/organization & administration , Politics , State Government
6.
Health Care Manag Sci ; 24(2): 356-374, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1173953

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 has disrupted healthcare operations and resulted in large-scale cancellations of elective surgery. Hospitals throughout the world made life-altering resource allocation decisions and prioritised the care of COVID-19 patients. Without effective models to evaluate resource allocation strategies encompassing COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 care, hospitals face the risk of making sub-optimal local resource allocation decisions. A discrete-event-simulation model is proposed in this paper to describe COVID-19, elective surgery, and emergency surgery patient flows. COVID-19-specific patient flows and a surgical patient flow network were constructed based on data of 475 COVID-19 patients and 28,831 non-COVID-19 patients in Addenbrooke's hospital in the UK. The model enabled the evaluation of three resource allocation strategies, for two COVID-19 wave scenarios: proactive cancellation of elective surgery, reactive cancellation of elective surgery, and ring-fencing operating theatre capacity. The results suggest that a ring-fencing strategy outperforms the other strategies, regardless of the COVID-19 scenario, in terms of total direct deaths and the number of surgeries performed. However, this does come at the cost of 50% more critical care rejections. In terms of aggregate hospital performance, a reactive cancellation strategy prioritising COVID-19 is no longer favourable if more than 7.3% of elective surgeries can be considered life-saving. Additionally, the model demonstrates the impact of timely hospital preparation and staff availability, on the ability to treat patients during a pandemic. The model can aid hospitals worldwide during pandemics and disasters, to evaluate their resource allocation strategies and identify the effect of redefining the prioritisation of patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Efficiency, Organizational , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Hospitals , Pandemics , Resource Allocation , Critical Care , Elective Surgical Procedures , Humans , Operating Rooms , Resource Allocation/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom
7.
Crit Care Med ; 49(7): 1068-1082, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1137999

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Eleven months into the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the country faces accelerating rates of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths. Little is known about the experiences of critical care physicians caring for the sickest coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Our goal is to understand how high stress levels and shortages faced by these physicians during Spring 2020 have evolved. DESIGN: We surveyed (October 23, 2020 to November 16, 2020) U.S. critical care physicians treating coronavirus disease 2019 patients who participated in a National survey earlier in the pandemic (April 23, 2020 to May 3, 2020) regarding their stress and shortages they faced. SETTING: ICU. PATIENTS: Coronavirus disease 2019 patients. INTERVENTION: Irrelevant. MEASUREMENT: Physician emotional distress/physical exhaustion: low (not at all/not much), moderate, or high (a lot/extreme). Shortage indicators: insufficient ICU-trained staff and shortages in medication, equipment, or personal protective equipment requiring protocol changes. MAIN RESULTS: Of 2,375 U.S. critical care attending physicians who responded to the initial survey, we received responses from 1,356 (57.1% response rate), 97% of whom (1,278) recently treated coronavirus disease 2019 patients. Two thirds of physicians (67.6% [864]) reported moderate or high levels of emotional distress in the Spring versus 50.7% (763) in the Fall. Reports of staffing shortages persisted with 46.5% of Fall respondents (594) reporting a staff shortage versus 48.3% (617) in the Spring. Meaningful shortages of medication and equipment reported in the Spring were largely alleviated. Although personal protective equipment shortages declined by half, they remained substantial. CONCLUSIONS: Stress, staffing, and, to a lesser degree, personal protective equipment shortages faced by U.S. critical care physicians remain high. Stress levels were higher among women. Considering the persistence of these findings, rising levels of infection nationally raise concerns about the capacity of the U.S. critical care system to meet ongoing and future demands.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Critical Care/psychology , Occupational Stress , Physicians/psychology , Psychological Distress , Adult , Disease Hotspot , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Workforce , Workplace
8.
Soins ; 65(849): 56-58, 2020 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-997635

ABSTRACT

The hospital pharmacy is a medico-technical department within the hospital which has been significantly affected by the COVID-19 crisis. It has been a crucial element in the supply and flow management of medicines and medical devices. The shortage of medicines, and in particular of five molecules essential for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, has resulted in stocks being managed on a national level in order to address these new and unknown challenges. Adaptability will remain the key word to describe the action of hospital pharmacies during this crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Hospitals , Humans
9.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol ; 35(3): 369-376, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-962786

ABSTRACT

Hospitals face catastrophic financial challenges in light of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Acute shortages in materials such as masks, ventilators, intensive care unit capacity, and personal protective equipment (PPE) are a significant concern. The future success of supply chain management involves increasing the transparency of where our raw materials are sourced, diversifying of our product resources, and improving our technology that is able to predict potential shortages. It is also important to develop a proactive budgeting strategy to meet supply demands through early designation of dependable roles to support organizations and through the education of healthcare staff. In this paper, we discuss supply chain management, governance and financing, emergency protocols, including emergency procurement and supply chain, supply chain gaps and how to address them, and the importance of communication in the times of crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Crew Resource Management, Healthcare/methods , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Civil Defense/economics , Civil Defense/methods , Crew Resource Management, Healthcare/economics , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/economics , Humans , Personal Protective Equipment/economics
10.
J Transl Med ; 18(1): 451, 2020 11 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-949113

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italian hospitals faced the most daunting challenges of their recent history, and only essential therapeutic interventions were feasible. From March to April 2020, the Laboratory of Advanced Cellular Therapies (Vicenza, Italy) received requests to treat a patient with severe COVID-19 and a patient with acute graft-versus-host disease with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (UC-MSCs). Access to clinics was restricted due to the risk of contagion. Transport of UC-MSCs in liquid nitrogen was unmanageable, leaving shipment in dry ice as the only option. METHODS: We assessed effects of the transition from liquid nitrogen to dry ice on cell viability; apoptosis; phenotype; proliferation; immunomodulation; and clonogenesis; and validated dry ice-based transport of UC-MSCs to clinics. RESULTS: Our results showed no differences in cell functionality related to the two storage conditions, and demonstrated the preservation of immunomodulatory and clonogenic potentials in dry ice. UC-MSCs were successfully delivered to points-of-care, enabling favourable clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This experience underscores the flexibility of a public cell factory in its adaptation of the logistics of an advanced therapy medicinal product during a public health crisis. Alternative supply chains should be evaluated for other cell products to guarantee delivery during catastrophes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Dry Ice , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/cytology , Point-of-Care Systems/organization & administration , Transportation , Acute Disease , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/pathology , Cell Proliferation , Cell Survival , Cells, Cultured , Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/standards , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/pathology , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Materials Management, Hospital/organization & administration , Materials Management, Hospital/standards , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/physiology , Organization and Administration/standards , Pandemics , Phenotype , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , SARS-CoV-2/physiology , Severity of Illness Index , Transportation/methods , Transportation/standards
11.
Ann Pharm Fr ; 78(6): 464-468, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-841723

ABSTRACT

On January 4 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported the emergence of a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China due to a new coronavirus, the SARS-CoV-2. A few weeks later, hospitals had to put in place a series of drastic measures to deal with the massive influx of suspected COVID-19 (COronaroVIrus Disease) patients while securing regular patient care, in particular in the intensive care units (ICU). Since March 12th, 77 of the 685 COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital required hospitalization in the ICU. What are the roles and the added-value of the critical care pharmacist during this period? His missions have evolved although they have remained focused on providing health services for the patients. Indeed, integrated into a steering committee created to organize the crisis in the intensive care units, the role of the clinical pharmacist was focused on the organization and coordination between ICU and the pharmacy, the implementation of actions to secure practices, to train new professionals and the adaptation of therapeutic strategies. He participated to literature monitoring and increased his involvement in the clinical research team. He provided a link between the ICU and the pharmacy thanks to his knowledges of practices and needs.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Critical Care , Pandemics , Pharmacists , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Clinical Trials as Topic/organization & administration , Committee Membership , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , France , Humans , Information Services , Information Storage and Retrieval , Interdisciplinary Communication , Job Description , Materials Management, Hospital , Patient Safety , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Role , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Intern Med J ; 50(10): 1267-1271, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-780902

ABSTRACT

During a pandemic when hospitals are stretched and patients need isolation, the role of hospital-in-the-home (HITH) providing acute medical care at home has never been more relevant. We aimed to define and address the challenges to acute home care services posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Planning for service operation involves staffing, equipment availability and cleaning, upskilling in telehealth and communication. Planning for clinical care involves maximising cohorts of patients without COVID-19 and new clinical pathways for patients with COVID-19. The risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, specific COVID-19 clinical pathways and the well-being of patients and staff should be addressed in advance.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Australasia/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Communication , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Health Workforce/organization & administration , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pandemics , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Workload
14.
Colorectal Dis ; 22(9): 1006-1014, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-742068

ABSTRACT

This European Society of Coloproctology guidance focuses on a proposed conceptual framework to resume standard service in colorectal surgery. The proposed conceptual framework is a schematic and stepwise approach including: in-depth assessment of damage to non-COVID-19-related colorectal service; the return of service (integration with the COVID-19-specific service and the existing operational continuity planning); safety arrangements in parallel with minimizing downtime; the required support for staff and patients; the aftermath of the pandemic and continued strategic planning. This will be dynamic guidance with ongoing updates using critical appraisal of emerging evidence. We will welcome input from all stakeholders (statutory organizations, healthcare professionals, public and patients). Any new questions, new data and discussion are welcome via https://www.escp.eu.com/guidelines.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , Colorectal Surgery/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/methods , Basic Reproduction Number , COVID-19/transmission , Colorectal Surgery/methods , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Europe/epidemiology , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Societies, Medical , Telemedicine/methods , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Triage , Waiting Lists
15.
Front Health Serv Manage ; 37(1): 33-38, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-730513

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has created global health and economic disruption. Hospitals and other healthcare providers have been hit particularly hard. While efforts to effectively treat and eradicate the coronavirus continue, so do the efforts of supply chains to support the provision of patient care in the event of a resurgence or future pandemic. Supply chain leaders must continuously evaluate their strategic and tactical positions to address critical supply needs. Whether the supply chain can meet expectations remains uncertain, given rolling supply shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE) and other medical-surgical supplies as healthcare providers resume prepandemic levels of operations. The ability to ensure a reliable, sustainable supply of critical PPE in the near term will remain a challenge. Longer-term substantive changes to the function and performance of healthcare supply chains will be necessary across multiple areas to meet demand more effectively during a crisis.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/economics , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Safety Management/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Humans , United States
16.
Farm Hosp ; 44(7): 32-35, 2020 06 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-599569

ABSTRACT

The Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the University Hospital of Fuenlabrada was  forced to critically increase its capacity in the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this work is to describe the activities promoted by the pharmacist in the care  of the critically ill patient in this context. A new organizational structure was  designed, analyzing the tasks necessary to make the processes profitable. Two  pharmacists joined the critical patient care to help the pharmacist who was  already integrated in the ICU team. The development of the operational  structure was carried out on three levels. The healthcare activity highlights the  daily participation of pharmacists in the two clinical sessions in which the ICU  teams evaluated all cases and made decisions. This in turn facilitated the  pharmaceutical validation that was carried out in the critical units themselves. In addition, one of the pharmacists created the Immuno-COVID Committee, in  which they participated together with different specialists for therapeutic  decision-making in the most complex cases. On the other hand, the availability  of human and material resources allowed the implantation of centralized  elaboration in the Pharmacy Service of many intravenous mixtures, including  antibiotics elastomers Pumps for continuous infusion, and non-sterile  elaborations. In logistics management, in addition to the acquisition of COVID- 19 therapies, the reconciliation with nursing activity stands out. The physical presence of the pharmacist favored the detection of needs, the  availability in time of medications in the unit, including sterile and non-sterile  preparations, and coordination with the central pharmacy. In knowledge  management, the participation of the pharmacist in the working group for the  development of the hospital management protocol COVID-19 stands out. The  daily presence in the unit and the joint work with the entire multidisciplinary team demonstrate the value that the pharmacist can bring. In addition to  efficient resource management, support for clinical decision-making and  improvement actions, it provides the climate of inter-professional trust necessary to respond to the complexity of the critical patient and promote joint  projects.


La Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos del Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada se  vio obligada a aumentar de manera crítica su capacidad en la pandemia por  COVID-19. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir las actividades impulsadas por el farmacéutico en la atención del paciente crítico en este contexto. Se diseñó  una estructura organizativa nueva, analizando las tareas necesarias para  rentabilizar los procesos. Dos farmacéuticos se incorporaron a la atención del  paciente crítico para ayudar al farmacéutico que ya estaba integrado en el  equipo de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. El desarrollo de la estructura  operativa se llevó a cabo en tres niveles. En la actividad asistencial destaca la  participación diaria de los farmacéuticos en las dos sesiones clínicas en las que  los equipos de la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos valoraban todos los casos y  tomaban las decisiones. Esto, a su vez, facilitaba la validación farmacéutica que  se realizaba en las propias unidades de críticos. Además, uno de los  farmacéuticos ideó el Comité Inmuno-COVID, en el que participaban junto a  diferentes especialistas para la toma de decisiones terapéuticas en los casos más complejos. Por otro lado, la disponibilidad de recursos humanos y materiales  permitió implantar la elaboración de forma centralizada en el Servicio de Farmacia de muchas mezclas intravenosas, incluyendo elastómeros de  antibioterapia en perfusión continua, y de elaboraciones no estériles. En la  gestión logística, además de la adquisición de las terapias COVID-19, destaca la  conciliación con la actividad de enfermería. La presencia física del farmacéutico  favorecía la detección de necesidades, la disponibilidad en tiempo de  medicamentos en la unidad, incluyendo las elaboraciones estériles y no estériles, y la coordinación con la Farmacia central. En la gestión del conocimiento destaca la participación del farmacéutico en el grupo de trabajo para desarrollo del  protocolo hospitalario de manejo de la COVID-19. La presencia diaria en la  unidad y el trabajo conjunto con todo el equipo multidisciplinar ponen de  manifiesto el valor que el farmacéutico puede aportar. Además de una gestión  eficiente de los recursos, soporte en la toma de decisiones clínicas y acciones de  mejora, proporciona el clima de confianza interprofesional necesario para dar  respuesta a la complejidad del paciente crítico y promover proyectos conjuntos.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , Pharmacists , Pneumonia, Viral , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/nursing , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Critical Care , Decision Making , Disease Management , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/supply & distribution , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals, University , Humans , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Team , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/nursing , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Professional Role , SARS-CoV-2 , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL